As we continue to emerge from the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic shutdowns, there is uncertainty (and plenty of hyperbole) about the future of downtowns. Once centers of commerce and weekday locales of millions of office workers, there are some underlying concerns about the obsolescence of downtown office space with the general acceptance of remote work across nearly all professional sectors. There is now an increasingly narrow demand pool of companies seeking space, especially at pre-pandemic levels. According to CoStar, there are more than one billion square feet of vacant office space nationally, not including leased space that is underutilized or available for sublease.
Increasing office vacancy has led to a lot of commentary on the “doom loop” of prolonged office vacancy, or the chain of events leading to economic downturns that occur when office space is left empty and not repurposed. However, even with changes in the economy, central business districts have an opportunity to adapt and meet the moment.
While this may seem bleak, it is important to recognize that many downtowns were losing their employment base long before the pandemic began, with the proliferation of suburban office parks, implementation of information technology, and automation of many job functions (e.g., there are way fewer filing clerks these days). Many downtowns were stabilized by residential development, expanding hospitality supply, and the concentration of government operations and workforce (although this is an increasingly less reliable source of stability at the federal level). Downtowns are now seen as the “front door” for visitors to a city and region given access to public transportation, arts and culture, and historic amenities. The shift to a 24-7 live-work-play downtown has been in process for decades now with the promotion of vibrancy through continued investments in arts and entertainment, festivals, placemaking, and public spaces.
Now the big question is what to do with all these office buildings. As a response to shifting workplace preferences in the 1990s with the need for more robust HVAC and IT systems, many historic skyscrapers and buildings (those generally built before 1940) went vacant for years. Through the historic tax credit (HTC) program – among others – developers began converting much of this office stock into residential units well before the pandemic, coinciding with general strategies to increase the downtown housing stock.
In this new era, a large share of buildings with the greatest adaptive reuse potential – smaller building size and floorplate configuration, as well as greater access to natural light – have been converted. Now the question is what to do with the Le Corbusier-inspired Internationalist or Brutalist buildings with larger floor plates, less access to natural light, and substantial scale (although generally everything gets more complicated and expensive as the building gets taller and you add more units). For example, based on a dataset compiled by CBRE, over the last 10 years, around 70 percent of office conversions were completed in buildings containing less than 200,000 square feet. ESI’s work on the New York City Office Adaptive Reuse Task Force in 2022 framed many of these issues and suggested an opportunity to examine regulations governing conversions and evaluate the potential of financial incentives to encourage the production of affordable housing.
As cities face housing supply shortages, the easy answer is to convert obsolete and/or less competitive office space into apartments or condominiums. But what is the path forward for properties that have designs or configurations that are less conducive for residential conversion?
The good news is that the market is already showing new opportunities for office conversions with a shift towards alternative commercial uses. According to CBRE, around half of office conversions over the last decade were for non-residential uses. Therefore, cities and states need to continue providing resources to create more opportunities but also consider these efforts as part of a broader downtown economic growth and diversification strategy.
As the economy evolves and the needs of cities and central business districts evolve, so will the use of commercial real estate in those areas. Innovative solutions will attract residents and visitors to cities and spur economic development.
Brian Licari | BLicari@Econsultsolutions.com
Brian Licari is a vice president at Econsult Solutions, Inc. (ESI). His career background and interests are in analyzing, developing, and implementing economic development and community revitalization strategies ranging in scale from the grassroots neighborhood level to regional business development efforts.