Anbound believes that smart city construction should master the two essential points: First, the city itself, and second, to serve people. If we ignore the needs of human beings, the construction of a smart city will become a "violent" technological application and become a "new technological morphine" for urban areas. If a city is full of closed-circuit television system, the government would be satisfied with the network management, but the city's public service is rather bad, what is the significance of such a smart city?